[Supplement II] Could the Hit Location Rules Be Fixed?

From Men & Magic to Unearthed Arcana; OD&D & Holmes.
The Book-House: Find OD&D products.

Moderators: Idabrius, Blacky the Blackball

[Supplement II] Could the Hit Location Rules Be Fixed?

Postby Havard » Sat Nov 26, 2016 3:16 pm

Even Dave Arneson said that he was not happy with the Hit Location Rules from Supplement II. I have not met any OD&D gamers who have said they use these rules. I do suspect that the Hit Location Rules, along with the Thief Skill Rules from Supplement I: Greyhawk were important in that they would become central to the development of RuneQuest. But in the history of D&D, it seems that this was a misstep.

RuneQuest is one of many systems that do feature Hit Location Rules, but would this concept even work with D&D?

I often felt that rolling for Hit Locations for every blow was annoying. One alternative could be to only roll for Hit Locations if the attack is a critical hit (natural 20). This could mean that the blow could cause some critical wound to the location hit, especially if that body part was not covered by armor.

Thoughts on this? Has anyone tried to fix the Hit Location Rules?

-Havard

Aliases: Håvard Frosta, Havard Blackmoor, Blackmoorian, Dragon Turtle etc
Where to find me on the Web
The Comeback Inn - My Blackmoor Forum
The Blackmoor Blog
My Articles at the Vaults of Pandius
Moderator of the Mystara, Blackmoor and Thunder Rift forums.
My moderator voice is
GREEN.
User avatar
Havard
Dragon Turtle
 
Posts: 17293
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 7:32 pm
Location: Norway

Return to Original D&D

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest