Mongoose Traveller 2E?

[Angel Tarragon]

Who has it? How different is it from 1E? What are the biggest changes? What changes do you like and/or dislike?

[Angel Tarragon]

Anyone? Bueller?

[The Dark]

I didn't bother to get it since:
a) I already have CT, MT, TNE, GT, and MgT1.
b) Mongoose has never really improved on their notoriously bad editing ("see p.xx").
c) It didn't look like it would support MTU, which is much less gravitics-intensive.

[Angel Tarragon]

I didn't bother to get it since:
a) I already have CT, MT, TNE, GT, and MgT1.
b) Mongoose has never really improved on their notoriously bad editing ("see p.xx").
c) It didn't look like it would support MTU, which is much less gravitics-intensive.

a) Not relevant to my query.
b) No book has perfect editing. Also not relevant to my query.
c) Not relevant to my query.
d) Perhaps next time you should try to provide details in your posts that are relevant to questions that quote from.

[The Dark]

I didn't bother to get it since:
a) I already have CT, MT, TNE, GT, and MgT1.
b) Mongoose has never really improved on their notoriously bad editing ("see p.xx").
c) It didn't look like it would support MTU, which is much less gravitics-intensive.

a) Not relevant to my query.
b) No book has perfect editing. Also not relevant to my query.
c) Not relevant to my query.
d) Perhaps next time you should try to provide details in your posts that are relevant to questions that quote from.

You appeared to be asking why nobody was responding with your second post. I took the opportunity to explain why I didn't have it, since I thought it might spark a polite conversation. Since I now understand my error in trying to engage in polite conversation with you, it shall not happen again.

[Big Mac]

I didn't bother to get it since:
a) I already have CT, MT, TNE, GT, and MgT1.
b) Mongoose has never really improved on their notoriously bad editing ("see p.xx").
c) It didn't look like it would support MTU, which is much less gravitics-intensive.

a) Not relevant to my query.
b) No book has perfect editing. Also not relevant to my query.
c) Not relevant to my query.
d) Perhaps next time you should try to provide details in your posts that are relevant to questions that quote from.

MODERATOR WARNING (by Big Mac): Angel: You said the following in your first post:

What changes do you like and/or dislike?

The Dark's response is a direct response to what he disliked about this product, and that is an answer given to your question in good faith. Perhaps that information is not what you are looking for, but The Dark spent the time to do what he thought would help you, and you responded by being rude. You could instead have thanked him for the information and asked another question, giving a bit more detail about what you were looking for. Please do not be rude to other forum members, especially when they are genuinly trying to help you.